Capital Markets

deputy head of strategy, SunGard’s capital markets business

DERIVATIVES DISCUSSION GROUP ON LINKEDIN

Posted by

Author: Tony Scianna, executive vice president, SunGard’s brokerage & clearance business

With the passage of financial regulatory reform, the derivatives industry has become a hotter and more newsworthy topic than ever before. Now there are new questions to address and there will be new challenges for derivatives industry professionals to solve and overcome as we all move forward. There’s a lot to talk about.

In the spirit of networks and collaboration, we have recently created a LinkedIn group to bring derivatives industry professionals together to discuss questions, challenges, and ongoing news in one focused place. The Cliq: A Derivatives Discussion is designed to foster conversation around derivatives industry issues, from the front- to the back-office, and as it grows, will be an interactive resource for aggregated news and discussion relevant to the community. To join the group, simply click here.

You’ll see some fledgling conversations have already begun among your peers. Weigh in with your opinions, share articles you find interesting, pose questions to the group, and help to shape this new group with your voice and expertise.

I look forward to you being a part of this industry discussion from the beginning.

ON INTERCONNECTEDNESS AND NETWORKS

Posted by

Author: Scott Foster, executive vice president, SunGard’s brokerage & clearance business

This year, you may have noticed that we are focusing heavily on the acronym TEN, which stands for Transparency, Efficiency, and Networks. If you are a regular reader of the brokerage & clearance blog, you’ll note that we often publish posts that discuss the themes of transparency and efficiency. Today we’ll give some attention to the N of TEN – the importance of networks in reshaping the financial markets.

After reflecting on notes from recent events, as well as the fact that we’re already more than halfway through 2010, I’ve given some thought to networks as a driving factor in business this year.

We can communicate with colleagues, clients, industry thought leaders and influencers from anywhere in the world with a click of a mouse or a push of a button. With this new ease of communication, it seems that we can form and maintain more relationships than ever before. Some people might say that this dilutes those relationships, but others recognize that networking is actually easier and more convenient. For example, you can update your status on LinkedIn, and your contacts are automatically notified – you don’t have to send out a mass e-mail anymore.

LinkedIn also exemplifies the new model of networks. It works as a traditional type of networking – making individual connections, many of which are based on existing face-to-face relationships – and gives you the ability to participate in and create virtual social and trade groups.

This is exciting, yet it also gives rise to new complexities.

Technology, which is a big part of why the markets are so interconnected today, is driving us into unexplored regions.  Our networks are becoming more expansive, more global, and more complicated than ever before. And this amplified interconnectedness underscores the greater need for transparency of financial activities, as it is impossible to make sense of systemic risk if you cannot see the data.

Now let me ask you, where do you stand on the spectrum of opinion? Is today’s interconnectedness a positive for business, or do you see complex networks as a negative? When you think of how networks are shaping today’s industry, what first comes to mind?

head of product management, Protegent, SunGard’s global trading business

Connect on LinkedIn

A COMPLIANT CENTRIC MIDDLE OFFICE – IS IT BETTER RISK MANAGEMENT OR JUST RISKY BUSINESS?

Posted by

By Rex Gooch – Head of Product Management, Protegent, SunGard’s Trading Business

Without a doubt, regulatory reform is atop everyone’s minds. You simply cannot skim financial services news headlines without reading about a new regulatory order or rule – whether it’s the Volker Rule or new Dodd-Frank bill… regulators are essentially laying a “smack-down” on the financial services industry. Now that financial reform bill HR-4173 has been passed into law, we can only anticipate that hundreds of new regulations and rules written by the Self Regulatory Organizations (SROs) will follow.  We don’t know what those will look like and how much of an impact they will have but what we do know is that the SEC and FINRA are today scrutinizing retail activities more than ever and have made financial and organizational changes to execute and pursue more aggressive enforcement activities.

And what does this mean for sell-side broker-dealers?

It means there’s an increased need to being better prepared to demonstrate due diligence. “More with less” has become the mantra and I believe the key to executing this idea is the consolidation and deployment of integrated technology solutions.

We are all aware that sell-side broker-dealers require several technological components to effectively run their middle-office operations. With compliance being an increasingly urgent element of firms’ business strategy, it makes perfect sense that a growing number of sell-side broker-dealers are tightly integrating their financial operations and compliance functions to automate processes that an operational analyst would do manually. Over the years, I have seen more and more retail broker-dealers lean toward the implementation of one cross-function system.

But really, how beneficial is one system to manage risk?

Much of a broker-dealer’s risk exposure can come from producers who behave in ways that expose the firm, their clients and themselves to an inordinate amount of risk.  This exposure may result from a lack of understanding or training and some of it is just unethical behavior.  Either way, agents’ compensation is based on their overall performance, which has always been measured by the amount of assets or revenue generated for the firm.   In this new era of regulation, it makes sense for broker-dealers to incorporate better compensation controls and measures around compliant behavior.  To make this work effectively, systems must integrate in a way that agent payments are automatically managed by not only traditional controls and measures but also compliance controls and measures.  I believe compliant behavior should be managed from the point of account opening to the payment of fees and commissions.

We all feel the burden on our resources and it makes sense for operations analysts to leverage their compensation processing systems to help manage risk.

Am I off the mark? Can a single integrated compliance-centric system really help you better manage your operations and keep auditors and regulators satisfied?

WEBINAR: ARE YOU OVERPAYING ON EXCHANGE AND CLEARING FEES?

Posted by

Author: Rich Hulit, executive vice president, SunGard’s brokerage & clearance business

A few months ago on this blog, I asked FCMs the following question: do you know if, where, and how much you are overpaying in brokerage and exchange fees? For many, this question is a difficult one to answer. Futures commission merchants are facing multiple challenges around exchange fees, clearing fees, and brokerage claims, including increasingly complex fee schedules, frequent modifications of fee rates and levels, and shorter deadlines for claiming rebates.

In our upcoming Professional Services Perspectives Webinar, my colleague Mark Connelly, who runs our Professional Services fee and commission review practice area, will talk through these questions and challenges and cover how to avoid overpaying on fees and commissions.

  • Do you know whether you are up to date with the latest fee schedules and rates?
  • Do you have a fee review procedure?
  • Do you manage fees on an enterprise-wide basis?
  • Do you always send in your rebate requests before the time window closes?

Many of the challenges FCMs face when it comes to managing fees can be overcome with the right internal policies, processes, and procedures to prevent miscalculations and miscommunication, as well as detect errors and ensure that fee rate updates are reflected in existing accounts.

REGISTER HERE
WEBINAR: Are You Paying Too Much in Exchange and Clearing Fees?
DATE: Thursday, July 29, 2010
TIME: 11:00 a.m. ET/ 4:00 p.m. BST

I look forward to you joining us on Thursday, July 29 for this discussion of how you can more efficiently manage fees. Register by using the link above, and as always, feel free to leave a comment for me and my team below.

THREE TAKEAWAYS FROM NEW YORK CITY DAY 2010

Posted by

Author: Gerry Murphy, former president, SunGard’s brokerage & clearance business

SunGard’s New York City Day event, held at the Waldorf-Astoria last week, was an afternoon filled with new ideas and forward-thinking conversations about best practices and the next steps for our industry.

From the start of the day through the keynote, during discussions in the hallways and in the focused breakout sessions, the energy was high and people were connecting to talk about what happens next.

For me, this annual event represents three key factors that are propelling our business and our industry forward.

  • Face-to-face time: We are all very busy, and it can sometimes seem impossible to leave the office or difficult to justify taking time between meetings to connect, share and learn together in person.  Events like SunGard’s City Days are focused on making the most of face-to-face time. For all the emails and phone calls that we exchange, they’re no replacement for shaking hands and talking in person. Read Aite Group research director Adam Honoré’s take on it here. It is it ever difficult for you to find face-to-face time?
  • Putting our heads together: The old adage “two heads are better than one” comes to mind. In the panel-style sessions at City Day, speakers built off each other’s ideas, and a collaborative spirit shaped the discussions. This harkens back to a blog post I wrote earlier in the year about diversity and the importance of having a variety of perspectives within your organization and the industry. It’s important to put our heads together and discuss the challenges and changes that are affecting our industry.

Did you attend SunGard’s New York City Day? What did you take away from the event? Do you value these three factors when you attend an industry event?

deputy head of strategy, SunGard’s capital markets business

EVERYONE’S TALKING ABOUT MARKET DATA

Posted by

Author: Tony Scianna, executive vice president, SunGard’s brokerage & clearance business

This Monday, SunGard hosted a live Twitterview centered on the topic of market data. Several voices were involved, including SunGard’s director of analyst relations Alyssa Gilmore (@Alyssa4AR), who hosted the event; Dorothy Friedman (@dorothyfriedman), director of marketing within SunGard’s brokerage & clearance business; Oliver Muhr (@olivermuhr), senior vice president of SunGard’s global trading business; and Adam Honoré (@HonoreatAite), research director and market data expert at Aite Group.

I followed the conversation – using the hashtag #marketmap – from London, and based on retweets it seems that several others were tuned in as well. The participants discussed top challenges in the market data space, key factors driving these challenges, the role of compliance, the importance of real-time data, and more.

In case you missed it, you can view the entire #marketmap Twitterview below. Do not hesitate to leave a comment or tweet to the participants if you have your own questions or ideas to share.

MarketMap Twitterview, June 7, 2010

Alyssa4AR Welcome to #marketmap: #marketdata with Adam Honore, Research Director, #AiteGroup (@HonoreatAite) & @olivermuhr, svp, @SGGlobalTrading

Alyssa4AR Our moderator is @dorothyfriedman, of @SGBrokerage. Hashtag is #marketmap. Please follow along & feel free to weigh in. #marketdata

Alyssa4AR Without further ado, here’s @dorothyfriedman with our first question. . . #marketmap

dorothyfriedman @Alyssa4AR Thanks. Let’s start with an overview of the market data world. What do you think are the top challenges in this space? #marketmap

HonoreatAite Volume & cost. May 6 exceeded 2.8m messages/second. Your infrastructure has to grow to support roughly 2x volume/year. #marketmap

olivermuhr Cost pressure, grtr efficiency in market data processes & infrastructure. Transparency around market data costs… cont’d #marketmap

olivermuhr Another challenge is around getting easy, no hassle & fast access to high quality, global market data. #marketmap

dorothyfriedman What factors are driving these issues? @HonoreatAite @OliverMuhr? #marketmap

HonoreatAite 2 things that feed off each other. Electronic trading and an interest in new markets & asset classes in trading strategies. #marketmap

olivermuhr There’s need for nextgen market data platforms that cntrl variable data cost, save infrastructure cost, integrate into other apps #marketmap

dorothyfriedman What about compliance & regs? That seems to be a concern for market data managers, just as it is in the larger fin svcs industry. #marketmap

olivermuhr Yes, in discussions about datafeeds and terminals, quality is mentioned in the same breath as coverage, cost & speed. #marketmap

HonoreatAite Expect data mgrs to bear a large share of the reg burden. Data quality & transparency will drive changes. #marketmap

dorothyfriedman So there is a push to make sure that data is clean and consistent? #marketmap

HonoreatAite Depends on your strategy. Clean is good, but in some cases, fast & dirty is better. In some cases, you may need raw & filtered. #marketmap

dorothyfriedman How are exchanges factoring into these issues? #marketmap

HonoreatAite Just did a report on exchange market data products. 19% of revenue on average & growing. Getting into tech business too. #marketmap

olivermuhr Look from the other side- market data fees are nontransparent cost for firms directly hitting their P&L w/o ctrl over it til now #marketmap

dorothyfriedman Is there room for disruption in the market on the terminal side? #marketmap

HonoreatAite Big time. Ask most CIOs their number one cost reduction area and market data terminals are likely to top the list. #marketmap

olivermuhr Yes. Firms need lightweight nextgen platform to cntrl variable #marketdata costs, improve processes & integrate -> existing apps #marketmap

dorothyfriedman Real-time data gets more headlines than historical data. Is that warranted or does historical data play an important role too? #marketmap

HonoreatAite Tough to develop a good strategy w/o it. Strategy development & testing is a growing area and we see room for improvement. #marketmap

olivermuhr Yes, absolutely, this goes hand in hand. @dorothyfriedman @HonoreatAite @Alyssa4AR #marketmap

Alyssa4AR Thanks, @dorothyfriedman, for #marketmap questions. We’re open to questions from the twitterverse. . .

dorothyfriedman We’ll be talking about these issues further at SunGard’s upcoming City Day in NY on June 21. Register now –http://bit.ly/bzyAEG #marketmap

Alyssa4AR Thanks @HonoreatAite, @olivermuhr and @dorothyfriedman for great #marketdata discussion. Missed it? search #marketmap

Alyssa4AR And join us for more discussion of #marketdata issues at SunGard’s City Day in NY on June 21 http://bit.ly/bzyAEG #marketmap

dorothyfriedman Thanks to all! @Alyssa4AR @HonoreatAite @olivermuhr #marketdata #marketmap

WEBINAR: ARE YOU TURNING COST BASIS INTO AN ADVANTAGE?

Posted by

Author: Rich Hulit, executive vice president, SunGard’s brokerage & clearance business

Beginning Jan. 1, 2011, cost basis reporting will be mandatory for all brokers executing transactions that involve publicly traded securities. This may prove to be easier said than done.

You must address technology and data issues now if you are to ensure future compliance with the regulations. But cost basis is not just about tax systems or even compliance. If it is approached the right way, this challenge may actually help increase efficiency, strengthen customer service and foster transparency.

That’s why our next Professional Services Perspectives Webinar will delve into the cost basis challenge – and how you can turn it into an advantage. My colleague David Elichman, who runs our Professional Services tax practice area, will lead the discussion.

  • Are you up to date on the regulations?
  • How does workflow play a part?
  • What are the technology challenges?
  • How are you approaching cost basis system integration?
  • What are your training and resourcing strategies?

Be part of the discussion – join the latest installment of our Professional Services Perspectives Webinar series and receive a free copy of our new white paper: “Cost Basis – Turning compliance into an opportunity to improve your business.”

REGISTER HERE
WEBINAR: Turning cost basis into an advantage
DATE: Thursday, June 10, 2010
TIME: 1:00 p.m. EST

I look forward to you joining us on Thursday, June 10 for this important discussion of how you can turn cost basis into an advantage. Register today to make sure you are part of the conversation.

MARK YOUR CALENDARS: SUNGARD’S NEW YORK CITY DAY IS ON JUNE 21

Posted by

Author: Gerry Murphy, former president, SunGard’s brokerage & clearance business

With summer approaching, it’s not only a great opportunity to take stock of where we are, but also to learn from each other. How can we best meet immediate challenges and help prepare for new business priorities that lie ahead?

That’s the focus at this year’s New York City Day, taking place on June 21, 2010, at the Waldorf Astoria. The focus for the day is on understanding what is on the horizon for our industry, while examining the significance that transparency, efficiency and networks will continue to play in the coming months.

Michael Lewis, author of The Big Short: Inside the Doomsday Machine, will be the keynote speaker. A New York Times best-selling author, Michael Lewis will undoubtedly provide an insightful and engaging start to the day. I am currently finishing The Big Short myself, so I am very much looking forward to hearing Michael speak. What are you hoping to take away from the keynote session?

To give you a taste of what you can expect that afternoon from SunGard’s brokerage and clearance business track, please take a look at the following sessions:

  • Transparency and efficiency in post-trade derivatives processing: The listed derivatives market is becoming more electronic, more global and more regulated than ever before and there is no standardized means of communication between the buy and sell sides. The clearing process is increasingly complex due to the rise in volumes, greater global activity and more adverse asset classes. And central clearing is bringing more transparency than ever before to the OTC market. How can firms improve their post-trade process and better manage risk? Hear from a panel of industry experts on how you can overcome these challenges and streamline the derivatives post-trade process.  Learn how you can decrease your counterparty exposure, automate transactions between participants, and gain greater control of your post trade activities.
  • Managing risk, controlling credit and handling collateral management in today’s regulatory environment: Can you calculate your real-time risk across your organization? Do you have a credit workflow that integrates your specific credit policies across all asset classes globally? Can you monitor counterparty exposure as well as perform collateral monitoring? Do you understand how the proposed regulatory changes will affect your business? If you’ve answered no to any of these questions, then don’t miss this session. Our panel of industry experts will discuss how several firms have used technology to help them manage their exposure in real-time, improve workflow, and better manage credit across all asset classes.
  • Managing data for cross-enterprise decisions: You face a deluge of data every day, trying to find that piece of information that will give you an edge. Can you analyze past patterns to shape the most effective strategy moving forward?  Do you get alerts when certain market developments occur? Are you getting reports with the information you need to make the most informed decisions enterprise-wide? Can you access the data you require easily and conveniently? Most important – is your data helping you to reduce risk? Hear how other firms have put the proper infrastructure in place to help them effectively manage their data, improve customer service, decrease costs and manage risk.

As you can see, we are packing many important industry discussions into one afternoon. REGISTER TODAY for this exciting event, and I hope to see you in New York in June.

In the meantime, visit our City Days site to learn about logistics, speakers, and additional sessions in New York and around the world. If you have any questions about the event, please contact us directly, or leave a comment below.

INTEGRATION IN A FRAGMENTED EUROPE: BRIDGING THE BACK-OFFICE GAP

Posted by

A joint venture between KAS BANK and SunGard is delivering superior control to trading firms.

The European securities market is “on fire” as trading venues and market participants continue to reinvent themselves in the wake of the introduction of the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID), says Laurens Vis, UK Managing Director, KAS BANK.

“MiFID had a profound effect on organisations in all markets, enabling participants to trade freely across Europe,” says Vis. “There is no longer a single platform on which ISINs are traded, which means our clients must provide trading capabilities throughout Europe, in order to meet the needs of their own clients as they increasingly trade across borders.”

KAS BANK is a specialist European bank offering a wide range of securities and investor services. Its clients include institutional investors such as pension funds, insurance companies and asset managers, as well as financial institutions including banks and brokers. Established more than 200 years ago, KAS BANK has always focused on securities services and acts as a general clearing member on most of Europe’s main exchanges and MTFs as well as on exchanges further afield including NYSE Euronext and Hong Kong. The bank is also a member of the major European central security depositaries (CSDs), such as Crest, Euroclear and Clearstream.

Post-trade complexity

Vis says the requirement to trade on multiple markets presents challenges not only on the trading side, but also on the post-trading side of the markets. Just as the number of trading venues has proliferated since the introduction of MiFID, so too has the number of clearing venues as many central counterparties (CCPs) have been launched to service the new MTFs.

Before MiFID, a stock would trade on a single stock exchange and be cleared on a single CCP and settled at a single CSD. In the MiFID world, trading firms must establish relationships with many more exchanges and with additional post-trade infrastructures, all at increased cost and complexity. Firms will have to consider how they will collect and process trade information once deals have been transacted in this more complex environment.

And as MiFID is reviewed, with details of a ‘MiFID II’ expected to be released by the European Commision this year, financial institutions could be in for a shock, says Vis. “In MiFID I, best execution was based on the venues on which a broker was prepared to trade. In MiFID II this may not be possible – brokers may be forced to seek the best price across all venues on which a stock is available for trading. This will be a significant challenge because sell-side firms will have to connect to a growing number of exchanges and MTFs and the corresponding CCPs that clear for them.”

In reality, some firms will be unable to afford or maintain the necessary post-trade infrastructure required. This increasingly complex and fragmented environment has led many broking firms to seek providers that can help them with connectivity at the front end, as well as those that can provide post-trade clearing and settlement services.

An integrated solution

“More and more brokers have been coming to us, seeking fully integrated services not only for the clearing and settlement elements, but also for other back-office components, such as static data maintenance, settlement instructions, cash and stock reconciliation, contract notes and trade accounting,” says Peter Rouwen, Director, Sales and Business Development at KAS BANK. “These brokers simply do not have the economies of scale to establish multiple relationships with a range of service and systems providers, and are instead looking for an integrated solution with a variable cost structure.”

In order to provide an all-in service proposition, KAS BANK partnered with SunGard to offer a new service under its Broker Services division. Underpinning the service is SunGard’s Stream RIMS Middle and Back Office, a comprehensive, real-time securities post-execution processing solution. Stream RIMS is highly scalable and its comprehensive use of automation enables global capital markets organisations to achieve maximum STP.

The partnership with SunGard means KAS BANK can provide a multitude of clients with a single, global platform for clearing, settlement and back-office services. The bank’s clients do not have to run their own back offices and can therefore focus on core trading activities and adding value for their clients, says Rouwen.

“We had clients who were already using SunGard’s products and it was natural that SunGard became our partner,” he says.

“SunGard has experience in providing back office services and has a similar ‘pure player’ approach to KAS BANK. We believe that the combination of a securities services provider and an IT provider can achieve strong results.”

The service consolidates previously separate functions on to a single, robust platform that is linked directly to KAS BANK’s cross-border clearing and settlement platform. Clients can deal exclusively with KAS BANK for all elements in the trading chain – from front-office deal capture through to cash and stock position reconciliation. Other features built on the Stream RIMS-based service include full trade accounting, provision of contract notes, posting to the general ledger and comprehensive regulatory reporting from a single source.

“With the introduction of Stream RIMS we now have a full suite of back-office services combined with post-trade DMA services,” says Vis. “Our offering delivers much greater control and transparency for the benefit of our customers.”

The service is aimed at securities houses that do not conduct enough transactions to justify the significant investment required to establish back-office infrastructures for the fragmented MiFID environment.

Benefits

MiFID unleashed significant price competition at the trading level, which exposed the high costs of the post-trade world. But in a more competitive environment, downward pressure on pricing is being felt along the value chain and for that reason, says Vis, KAS BANK’s clients have had to reinvent themselves and play to their core strengths. By offering a completely seamless post-trade service, KAS BANK will help its clients to gain greater control over their costs in order to focus on revenue generating front-office activities.

“The joint venture with SunGard will enable our clients to offload fixed costs in their middle and back offices and move to a more variable cost base,” says Vis.

Clients will be able to capitalise on the expertise of both KAS BANK and SunGard, something they may not have been able to do alone. “Firms who typically would have had to invest in separate back-office systems and links to securities services providers, can now use one party – KAS BANK – to take care of their core back-office functionality,” says Rouwen. “Our partnership with SunGard has changed the way we deal with our clients. We have bridged the gap between the back offices of our clients and our clearing and settlement services, offering a best of breed service. It has been a big step forward.”

As the European trading, clearing and settlement world continues to fragment and increase in complexity, says Vis, the combination of KAS BANK and SunGard will deliver superior control to trading firms, which is a “good thing for the market”.

WHAT HAPPENED IN GLOBAL FINANCIAL MARKETS – Q1 2010 versus Q1 2009?

Posted by

What are the main trends in the evolution of traded volumes in both equity and derivatives over the past year? This article provides the answers.

When comparing the first quarter of 2010 to that of 2009, one can see that capital markets show signs of recovery. This evolution was driven by a growing trend in domestic market capitalization, volume and turnover of trades in equity and derivative markets, and, up to the end of Q1 2010, lower volatility. In the EMEA and Asia-Pacific regions market activity rose above 2009 levels although a flat trend was apparent in the US. Volumes increased steadily on the European MTF Markets and on emerging markets like Brazil and Istanbul.

1 – Volatility

  • 6 months VIX* S&P 500

volatility2

*VIX is the ticker symbol for the Chicago Board Options Exchange Volatility Index, a popular measure of the implied volatility of S&P 500 index options. A high value corresponds to a more volatile market and therefore more costly options, which can be sold to defray risk from this volatility. Often referred to as “the fear index”, it represents a measure of the market’s expectation of volatility over the next 30 days.

  • 3 years
source: MarketMap

source: MarketMap

Market volatility has declined precipitously since peaking in November 2008. At the end of first quarter 2010, the VIX was around the 18% level and hovering near the 52-week low, reflecting optimism among market participants. Those levels have not been seen since early 2008 and are not far from the lows near 10 seen in early 2007 before the collapse of the subprime market.

2 – Value of Shares Traded

chart012

In Q1 2010, overall cash equities turnover increased by 10 % compared to Q1 2009. The Asia-Pacific and the EMEA zones improved markedly by 32% and 31% respectively compared to the same period in 2009, whilst the Americas have dropped slightly by1%.

Compared to Q4 2009, Asiatic turnover of shares traded decreased by 11% whilst an improvement of 4% and 6% occurred in the Americas and EMEA.

Below is a comparison showing between Q1 2010 and Q1 2009 at the top 5 growing markets by zone:

[table id=1 /]

3 – European MTF Markets

chart02

2009 was a good year for the European MTF Markets, and most of them are continuing in steady growth in 2010. Comparing Q1 2010 to Q1 2009 the growth has been huge: 467% for Bats, 148% for Chi-X, and 982% for Neuro but Turquoise’s turnover has fallen by 16%.

4 – Volume of equity trades

chart04

Between Q1 2009 and Q1 2010 the overall volume of equity trades declined by 16%, affected by continuous deterioration in the Americas (-38%), whilst the Asia-Pacific and EMEA zones are recovering, respectively up 8% and 11% compared to a year ago.

5 – Total value of bonds trading by region

chart03

In Q1 2010, EMEA represented 92% of overall bond turnover, the Americas 6% and Asia-Pacific 2%. Compared to Q1 2009, bond turnover increased by 24% in the Americas and declined by 22% in Asia and by 16% in EMEA.

6 – EMEA Bonds vs. Shares Turnover

chart05

In Q1 2009 EMEA Fixed income turnover from bonds was 32% higher than the value of shares traded but, by Q1 2010, the difference between the two had been reduced to only 9%.

7 – Domestic Market Capitalization

chart10

In Q1 2010, domestic market capitalization (DMC) increased markedly, by 55%, compared with Q1 2009. Asia-Pacific grew the most (63%), followed by EMEA (55%) and then the Americas (50%). The top-five growing exchanges by zone in DMC between Q1 2009 and Q1 2010 were as follows:

[table id=2 /]

8 – Derivatives Volume of contracts

source: FOI

source: FOI

The most growth was in Currency contracts, up 163% in Q1 2010 compared with Q1 2009; volume in interest rate and agriculture contracts also increased markedly, by 41% and 48% respectively.

source: FOI

source: FOI

During the first quarter 2010, contract volumes on the four major derivatives exchanges increased by 18% compared to Q1 2009. Liffe saw the most growth (29%), then CME (27%) and ICE (25%), however, volume on Eurex was flat (-0.26%).

source: FOI

source: FOI

Volume of contracts traded in Q1 2010 was higher than in Q1 2009 for all regions except Africa. Overall volume of derivatives contracts increased by 19%; most growth was in the Asia-Pacific zone (38%), followed by South America (25%), the US (10%) and Europe (6%).