Author Archive

Staff Development – A Time for Review

By Ramiro Zuniga, Ed. D.

Looks like the 2010-2011 school year has kicked off! This is a perfect time to look at the staff development that public schools have offered in the previous year and during this summer. I think that there is a real need for public school administrators to evaluate their offerings.

During a study that I conducted on technology integration in public schools, over 60% of the teachers that I interviewed identified the lack of quality training as a factor that has hindered the level of integration in their classrooms. By far, this was the most common factor identified in the study that I conducted. Regrettably, this is not an uncommon finding. In fact, the lack of quality training is a factor that is mentioned quite frequently in various other technology integration studies. The lack of quality training has also been a recurring topic of discussion with my graduate students semester after semester.

Over the years, I have heard or read many comments regarding the quality of staff development offered by school districts. Many teachers have expressed a negative view of staff development in general, for various reasons. Some have indicated that it’s the same presenters passing out the same material. This practice leads to teachers not being engaged in whatever training is being offered. Some have indicated that they attend staff development on technologies that are not present in their classrooms or schools. This results in spending hours on a technology that they cannot use, regardless of how great the technology. Other teachers have indicated that they never see their administrators at any of the sessions and so they believe that the training being offered is insignificant. And still, others indicate that some of the topics covered in some sessions just aren’t relevant to their academic mission.

The end result of this is frustrated teachers and administrators that have lost some credibility. When it comes to technology integration, you end up with teachers that are not prepared to integrate technology into their curriculum. You also end up with teachers that do not appreciate the value of a particular technology and simply decide not to use it.

What is interesting about these comments is that these comments continue to be repeated year after year after year. Whenever I encounter a teacher expressing such a concern, I ask why this is. The typical response that I get is that no one really listens to teachers. They simply offer the staff development on the administration’s beliefs of what is needed. Some teachers have told me that they no longer provide genuine feedback because they have never seen their comments being acted on by those offering the staff development.

Here are a few things that school district leaders can do to maximize the positive impact of staff development at their schools and departments:

  • Conduct a thorough review and act on the information collected via staff development evaluation forms.
  • Campus principals should take the time to speak to each teacher individually in an effort to find out what the staff development needs really are. Granted, this is more difficult in large schools but the payback is worth it. Teachers will feel validated, as their individual input is being considered.
  • Conduct a thorough review of current staff development offerings to ensure that the training offered is relevant.
  • Recognize that staff development should be a “hands on” situation in which materials can be developed and built upon, long after the staff development sessions have ended.
  • Do not provide staff development on equipment, software, or materials that teachers will not have immediate and continued access to after the session, otherwise it is wasted time.
  • Most importantly, campus administration should be visibly participating in staff development sessions. Doing so validates the value offered by the staff development session.

Whether staff development sessions are offered during the year or during summer, it is a great opportunity for professional growth. It is also an excellent opportunity to “bring in” new ideas and new teaching strategies. Staff development, when well balanced and relevant, can be a great motivator to teachers and staff. This is especially true at the start of the school year.

Feel free to share your ideas on how to better offer and sustain an excellent staff development program.

Administrators as Models – A Key to Integration

By Ramiro Zuniga, Ed. D.

Let me begin by telling you a short story.  This story may sound like it took place back in perhaps the early 1990s but it did not.  This story took place late in the fall of 2009.
And so the story begins…
I had just participated in a product demonstration at a school district and had begun to make the usual round of introductions to each committee member.  During my introductions, I had the pleasure of meeting a technology administrator and one of the assistant superintendents.  As I conversed with both ladies, the assistant superintendent indicated to me that she was in charge of the committee and responsible for carrying forward the final recommendation.  I closed our conversation by letting the assistant superintendent know that I would be sending her more information related to the product that we were demonstrating, to which she responded favorably.
A couple of days later I called the technology administrator, as a courtesy, to inform her that I was forwarding additional information via e-mail to the assistant superintendent, as promised.
The technology administrator advised me to send a copy of the e-mail to the assistant superintendent’s secretary.  She went on to tell me, in a very matter of fact manner, that the assistant superintendent did not know how to use their e-mail system and would have her secretary print out every e-mail for her to read.  The assistant superintendent would then write out a response and have her secretary send it out via the e-mail system.
Needless to say, I complied.
I wish I could say that this story was an anomaly, an exception, or a rare occurrence, but it is not.  Today, I find that there are still many administrators uncomfortable with technology.  This scenario is constantly brought forth every time that my master level students share similar stories from within their respective school districts.
I share this story to make a point.  If school district administrators want a higher level of technology integration in their schools, they must lead the way.  After all, if administrators do not view technology integration with much importance, why would anyone else across their district?
I know well enough that the carrying on of an administrative role in a school district can be challenging.  However, I also know that being an “educational leader” comes with certain responsibilities related to being innovative and being a role model.
I have said before that it is important that educational leaders look within, take stock, and improve where he or she can.  It is in that spirit that I share some leadership principles that I ran across while doing some reading on leadership.
The document that I ran across was the United States Marine Corps – Leadership Principles and Traits.  Although I won’t discuss each of the 11 leadership principles and 14 leadership traits found within this document, I will discuss 3 very important principles that certainly apply here.
  • Principle # 1 – Know yourself and seek self improvement
  • Principle # 2 – Be technically and tactically proficient
  • Principle # 5 – Set the example
It is critical that educational leaders know themselves and continually seek self improvement. How else will they know what is out there in terms of technology?  Educational leaders must take steps forward to become more technology proficient.  How can they really understand the benefits of a new technology if they know nothing about how it works and what they can do with it?  Most importantly, educational leaders are always being observed as to what they model.  If a teacher sees that his or her principal does not use technology, then neither will that teacher.
Granted, school district administrators are not leading anyone to war, but they are leading nonetheless.  And too, this is not the only leadership model that can be referenced, but it is one of the more direct and clear models that I have encountered.  Many of the principles in this document can easily be applied to school district administration.  I find that the 3 principles listed above apply so well to the technology integration process.