Posts Tagged ‘Common Core Standards’

eTech Ohio Highlight: Tackling Common Core with STEM

By SunGard K-12 Staff

During her eTech Ohio presentation, Maryann Wolowiec, president of IEL Educational Consulting, made the case that STEM is by its very nature aligned with Common Core principles. As evidence to support her premise, Wolowiec shared her experiences as project manager for the creation of the National Inventors Hall of Fame® … Center for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Learning. Maryann Wolowiec

The National Inventors Hall of Fame® is a public middle school in Akron, Ohio. Its vision is to “provide the highest quality education experience for students, which ensures creativity and inventive thinking through a focus on science, mathematics, and technology.” The school, which is housed in the former home of the National Inventors Hall of Fame, is not just for students who are gifted in the STEM disciplines. “The school is for all students of all abilities and really represents the demographics of Akron,” said Wolowiec.

At the school, learning begins with a real-world problem.

In problem-based learning, the curriculum is organized around a holistic problem, enabling student learning in relevant and connected ways. According to the Illinois Math and Science Academy Problem-Based Learning Network, problem-based learning “creates a learning environment in which teachers coach student thinking and guide student inquiry, facilitating learning toward deeper levels of understanding while entering the inquiry as a co-investigator.”

Along the path to a solution, students gather more than just knowledge and skills associated with science, technology, engineering, and mathematics disciplines. They also gain the ability to problem solve, to engage in interdisciplinary thinking, to collaborate locally and globally, and to be creative and inventive thinkers with an entrepreneurial mindset.

This is consistent with the goals of Common Core standards, which according to the Common Core website, “are designed to be robust and relevant to the real world, reflecting the knowledge and skills that our young people need for success in college and careers.”

Although problem-solving is a key component, Wolowiec cautions that STEM is more than PBL. “STEM is a system change,” she said. “It’s really about the whole child.”

In designing the curriculum, Wolowiec says that National Inventors Hall of Fame® educators start with the standards. “The first step is you have the team of teachers curriculum-map the whole year,” she said. Although the PBL units are usually developed around social studies issues or around science issues, the other disciplines leverage the problem to teach essential skills. “Language Arts loves the units, because they can build in so much reading,” emphasizes Wolowiec.

Educators at the school didn’t “force” everything to fit the same mold. “Instead of going out and picking a problem and trying to stuff all the standards into a problem, we work the other way,” she explains. “We [ask], ‘What is it that we need to the kids to be able to do? Who are our learners? What are their interests? Who are our community members, our partners?’”

The educators also supplement their problem-based unit with instructional materials that aligned with this philosophy and vision. “So when the students are not in a problem-based learning unit, they may be in a math unit that supports that kind of thinking using connected math,” explains Wolowiec. “We tried to find curricular development material that supports that kind of learning so that everything that is being done is reinforcing each other.”

Students who learn through this process are curious about the world and are not afraid to take on the problems they see using the knowledge they have. “We want students who are informed risk-takers,” she said. “We want students who are not afraid of failure, but who will fail and will try again.”

Students Address the Common Core Standards

By Dr. Bena Kallick

Finally the words that have been missing from state standards are addressed in the common core standards:

  • “Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them”
  • “…work independently”

Common Core Standards recognize the significance of students become more self-directed learners.  Instead of raising their hands, waiting for someone to rescue them from learning, they are emphasizing that students need to develop the dispositions or habits of mind that will motivate them to be more independent, self-directed learners.

Costa and Kallick (www.instituteforhabitsofmind.com) offer 16 habits such as persisting, communicating with clarity and precision and striving for accuracy.  Their research both from theory and practices across the world suggest that when students develop a disciplined attitude for learning, they not only tackle the tasks at hand with greater success, they also develop a lifelong set of skills that will help them become more successful in life.

The steps to building these habits start with awareness or self-discovery. Students need to know where their strengths are, where their challenges are, and where they have the greatest opportunities to improve in their learning habits.   Once they are aware, goal setting becomes important.  One example of goal setting is exemplified in the Individual Learning Plan (ILP) that is a part of PerformanceTRACKER (part of PerformancePLUS).  Students work with teachers to set and monitor goals based on addressing the common core standards.  Students can own their assessment data and make observations about their progress in order to demonstrate improvement.  They can talk with their parents about how they are doing, creating their own report card of progress. They can learn how to strengthen their habits of mind so that they are working both with their attitudes as well as their academic accomplishments.

Ultimately, the quality of the work will be in the hands of the workers.  When we include students in managing themselves, monitoring their progress, and modifying their behaviors based on reflection and evaluation, they are ready for learning at school and at work.

Common Core Standards Call for Uncommon Shifts in Practices

By Dr. Bena Kallick

The recent report from the Center on Education Policy (PDF) provides a perspective on the key issues districts will need to deal with as they make a transition from their present work based on state standards to the common core standards.  There are implications in the following four areas:

  • Curriculum— Most districts have been working diligently to develop a standards-based curriculum that is aligned both to the standards and the internal design. Many districts use curriculum mapping as their method for doing this work, realizing that it will be necessary to use technology in order to create a dynamic and responsive curriculum.  The state standards have changed as educators learn more about what is required for students to make certain that students are “college ready” as well as ready for a lifetime of learning.  The common core standards emphasize this level of learning with a particular emphasis on higher level thinking.  This will mean some work on the part of the districts to do a cross walk between the state standards and the common core standards so that they identify three areas:  (1) where are the standards of each the same (therefore no revision, just a replacement) (2) where are the standards moderately different (therefore some tweaking and moderate re-aligning) and (3) where are the standards new and different (new standards to be added and possibly replacing some standards that are no longer on the list (new units of study, new alignments).
  • Instruction— Teachers will have to learn new strategies for helping all students reach to a higher level of thinking.  There will be more work on interpreting, explaining, reasoning with evidence, drawing conclusions, summarizing, and evaluating. Lessons will have to be designed that address ways for teachers to develop the curiosity, investigations, and innovative thinking that the common core standards call for.  Use of technology as a way to stimulate students’ thinking will be an important aspect of new lesson designs.
  • Assessment— Although it has been economically efficient to measure with multiple choice and constructed response questions, there will be a need for more performance assessment.  Districts may want to work in a consortium with other districts so that the design and scoring systems are developed with an eye for validity and reliability.  There is a national committee already at work on this and new performance assessments based on the common core standards are anticipated in the next year.  Students will need practice on this sort of assessment at the local level.
  • Professional Development— Much of what is described above will require thoughtful work on the part of the educators.  Given how limited the resources are that schools presently have, there will need to be more ways to use technology to encourage social, online learning.  Teachers will need to document and construct their curriculum, lessons, and assessments.  There will need to be a library of practices that have been vetted for quality and accessible to teachers.

The common core standards will call for some uncommon shifts in practices.  In order to take advantage of what is meant by “common”, we will have to find ways to document, analyze, evaluate and share what we are learning in consortia at the regional, state, and national level.

*To receive updates when new blogs are posted, follow us on Twitter: SunGardK12