Contributor: Michael Bosacco
In an era of performing more tasks with fewer resources, one would imagine that treasury technology alternatives, specifically bank connectivity, would become easier.
In an era of performing more tasks with fewer resources, one would imagine that treasury technology alternatives, specifically bank connectivity, would become easier. Instead, it seems that as staff dwindles, bank communication options increase, and with it, a myriad of considerations. Just think, for a corporate to communicate/interface with just one bank, a decision tree that resembles the following ensues:
(1) Type of reports
a. Previous day
i. Balances only
ii. Balances and transactions
b. Current day
i. Incremental or aggregate
ii. Transactions only
iii. Balances and transactions
(2) Format of report
a. BAI2
b. CAMT
c. EDI
d. MT
(3) Encryption methodologies
a. PGP
b. SSL
c. 128 bit
d. AES 256 bit
(4) Communication protocol
a. FTPS
b. SFTP
c. VPN
d. Internet
e. SWIFT
i. FIN
ii. FileAct
(5) Cost
a. Bank cost
b. Vendor cost
(6) Security considerations
a. SAS 70 Type II
b. SSAE 16
c. Tier IV data centers
d. Firewalls
e. Ports
(7) Monitoring
a. Identified points of failure
b. Accountability for failed transmissions
c. Acknowledgements
Although the above represents only a sample of the considerations involved when establishing bank connectivity, each component must be re-examined with each banking partner. And unfortunately, the lack of standardization across banks introduces an added layer of implementation complexity that further supports the need for a managed connectivity service.
In today’s corporate treasury setting, the demand for outsourced managed connectivity should not come as a surprise. As a former corporate treasury practitioner, I am familiar with not only what it means to implement, configure, test and support a bank communication hub, but I am also conscious of the strain on in-house IT and business process owners; frequently, the corporate connectivity environment quickly becomes unmanageable. Access to a managed connectivity hub is advantageous for corporations – it facilitates a single channel communication environment between the corporate and vendor and essentially outsources all the complexities and tasks associated with bank interfaces. The three key benefits to a best in class managed connectivity hub are:
(1) Reliability, security and resiliency
(2) Flat-fee pricing
(3) Data transparency
In simplest terms, corporate Treasury has a need to send and receive information, but they are disinterested in owning the process. Corporates only want to own and analyze the data with near guaranteed delivery.
Are you and your corporate IT department challenged with the management of in-house bank connectivity? If so, have you considered outsourcing it?

previous post


August 31st, 2011 at 4:18 pm
#SunGard TEN Blog: Bank connectivity made easy, outsource it!: In an era of performing more tasks with fewer res… http://t.co/cTIVIYI
August 31st, 2011 at 4:18 pm
#SunGard TEN Blog: Bank connectivity made easy, outsource it!: In an era of performing more tasks with fewer res… http://t.co/zm7WkaD
August 31st, 2011 at 4:18 pm
#SunGard TEN Blog: Bank connectivity made easy, outsource it!: In an era of performing more tasks with fewer res… http://t.co/mT2kKG0
September 1st, 2011 at 8:04 am
#Networks Bank connectivity made easy, outsource it! | SunGard Transparency …: SHARE. Tags: bank communication… http://t.co/cKqgmg7